Vance v. Judas Priest
Washoe Cty. Dist. Ct., Second Judicial District, 1990
The subliminal messages trial. Nineteen days of bench testimony in Washoe County. A pre-trial First Amendment ruling that became the defining doctrinal moment of the case.
The Matter
On December 23, 1985, Raymond Belknap (age 18) and James Vance (age 20) of Sparks, Nevada entered into a suicide pact after hours of listening to the Judas Priest album “Stained Class.” Belknap died at the scene. Vance survived, severely disfigured, and died three years later.
The Belknap family retained Mr. McKenna. The Vance family retained Timothy Post. The two cases merged, with Mr. McKenna taking the lead role. The defense was Judas Priest and CBS Records — represented by counsel with the resources of a major recording label.
Early in the engagement, Mr. McKenna sent the album to Bill Nickloff, an audio producer who had previously been a client in an unrelated divorce matter. Nickloff reported subliminal messages embedded in the track “Better By You, Better Than Me.” That report shifted the legal theory from lyrics-based liability to subliminal-based liability — a decision that defined the rest of the case.
Before trial, Judge Jerry Carr Whitehead of the Washoe County District Court ruled that subliminal content is not entitled to First Amendment protection because, by design, it cannot contribute to the marketplace of ideas. The defense had argued for blanket First Amendment immunity. The ruling cleared the way for a nineteen-day bench trial in the summer of 1990, conducted as a national media event at the Washoe County Courthouse.
Mr. McKenna and co-counsel Vivian Lynch presented expert testimony on subliminal psychology and computer-enhanced audio demonstrations in which the phrase “do it” could be heard at least seven times. Closing argument sought $6.2 million in damages. Judge Whitehead ultimately ruled against the plaintiffs on liability — finding that subliminal sounds were present but had not been placed intentionally — while imposing $40,000 in sanctions against CBS Records for withholding master recordings during discovery. In his ruling, the judge wrote that “the position taken by the plaintiffs in this action was an arguable one.” The 1992 documentary “Dream Deceivers” recorded the trial and its aftermath.
Legal Significance
The pre-trial ruling appears to remain the principal judicial examination of subliminal messages and First Amendment protection in United States legal history. Later commentary in media-law and product-liability scholarship has treated it as the governing point of reference on the subject.
The ruling established that the First Amendment does not extend to content engineered to communicate below the threshold of conscious awareness — the central doctrinal line that emerged from the litigation.
Mr. McKenna’s Role
Lead counsel for the Belknap family from engagement through verdict. Architect of the subliminal-messaging legal theory after the initial lyrics-based approach proved inadequate. Secured the pre-trial First Amendment ruling over organized defense opposition. Conducted expert examination at trial and delivered the closing argument.
Citations & Related Authority
Trial
Pre-Trial (jurisdictional)
Documentary
Begin a Conversation
Mr. McKenna reviews inquiries personally and responds within three business days to matters that meet the criteria of his practice.