Skip to content
Kenneth J.McKenna
Kenneth J. McKenna · PLATE I. · THE LAWYERNev. State Bar № 1676

About · Plate I.

Forty-five years,
one trial lawyer.

Kenneth J. McKenna was admitted to the Nevada State Bar in 1980. He has spent four and a half decades in Nevada state and federal courts — trying cases that redefined the law, carrying appeals to the Ninth Circuit en banc, and defending men and women whose freedom, fortune, or reputation depended on the outcome.

Kenneth J. McKenna in his Reno office
Biographical spine

The path, in four chapters.

Admission, early practice, precedent, and the narrowing of scope to trial-ready flat-fee engagements.

  1. I
    1976 — 1980

    McGeorge, and the bar

    Undergraduate at the University of Nevada. Law school at McGeorge School of Law. Admitted to the Nevada State Bar in 1980. Bar № 1676. One number, held for forty-five years.

  2. II
    1980 — 1989

    Early practice and the capital case

    First decade in Nevada state and federal trial courts. In 1982, joined the appellate team for McKenna v. State — his brother’s capital murder appeal. The Nevada Supreme Court’s 1985 decision framed Eighth Amendment, Witherspoon, Witt, mitigation, clemency, and proportionality review together. Criminal trial practice becomes the backbone.

    ↳ Dossier:McKenna v. State
  3. III
    1990 — 2006

    Three precedents

    The 1990 Judas Priest bench trial — nineteen days in Washoe — produced the principal judicial ruling in U.S. history on whether subliminal messages are protected by the First Amendment. Eight years later, Allum v. Valley Bank set the Nevada wrongful-discharge standard still cited today. Eight years after that, Jespersen v. Harrah’s went en banc before the full eleven-judge Ninth Circuit.

  4. IV
    2007 — 2026

    Selective, flat-fee, trial-ready

    Moonin v. Tice added a First Amendment prior-restraint victory at the Ninth Circuit, now reflected in the circuit’s model jury instructions. The practice narrows to matters where the legal complexity and financial exposure justify the engagement. Fees become flat, set at retention, paid in full. Hourly billing is discontinued.

    ↳ Dossier:Moonin v. Tice
Working principles

Six rules the practice runs on.

  1. RULE 01.

    Prepare every case as if it will be tried.

    The ability to try a case is what creates settlement leverage. Preparation is never conditional.

  2. RULE 02.

    Fees are flat, paid in full at engagement.

    The price reflects the scope. No hourly billing. No budget meetings during representation.

  3. RULE 03.

    Every motion that should be filed is filed.

    The client is never asked to weigh thoroughness against cost.

  4. RULE 04.

    Every witness who should be deposed is deposed.

    Discovery is driven by the matter, not the budget.

  5. RULE 05.

    The record is the advocacy.

    What the court sees is what the court will act on. Write every filing accordingly.

  6. RULE 06.

    The door is narrow, on purpose.

    Decline the cases where counsel cannot add value. Accept the ones where experience and stamina matter.

Credentials of record
Bar admission
Nevada State Bar № 1676 · Admitted 1980
Federal courts
U.S. District Court, D. Nevada · U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
U.S. Supreme Court
Eligible, admitted upon application
Law school
McGeorge School of Law
Undergraduate
University of Nevada
En banc argument
Jespersen v. Harrah's, 444 F.3d 1104 (9th Cir. 2006) (en banc)
Death-penalty qualified
Nevada capital-case qualified
Languages
English. Inquiries accepted in Spanish and Chinese.
Office
Reno, Nevada · Statewide practice
Established
1980
Next

Review the record.