Skip to content
Kenneth J.McKenna
Serious Criminal Defense · IV

Federal Criminal Defense in the District of Nevada

Selected federal defense in the District of Nevada, including serious drug and conspiracy cases, grand-jury investigations, indictments, detention hearings, motion practice, trial, and sentencing.

Editorial portrait of Kenneth J. McKenna in a generic stone institutional corridor
§ Direct answer

Federal criminal cases in Nevada proceed in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada under federal statutes, the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and the court’s local rules. The early stages commonly include grand-jury charging and a release or detention decision under 18 U.S.C. § 3142. Mr. McKenna considers selected serious federal matters in Reno and Las Vegas while maintaining a single Reno-based practice.

§ 01

Federal exposure requires a federal procedural plan

The practice considers selected federal investigations and prosecutions involving serious drug charges, conspiracy, multi-defendant allegations, search warrants, target letters, grand-jury subpoenas, and other matters whose scope warrants trial preparation. A federal case should not be treated as a state felony with different stationery; charging, detention, discovery, motion practice, and sentencing are governed by a separate framework.

Northern Nevada matters are heard at the Bruce R. Thompson United States Courthouse in Reno. Southern Nevada matters are heard in Las Vegas. The practice does not claim a Las Vegas office; it evaluates selected District of Nevada matters statewide.

§ 02

Grand jury, detention, the federal clock, and offense-specific statutes

Federal felony charges ordinarily proceed by indictment unless indictment is waived. Release and detention are governed by 18 U.S.C. § 3142. The judicial officer considers the options and factors in the statute and may order detention after the required hearing and findings.

The Speedy Trial Act, including 18 U.S.C. § 3161, establishes charging and trial time limits with statutory exclusions. Those exclusions make calendar analysis more complex than simply counting 70 days. Motion practice and continuances can alter the calculation.

In controlled-substance cases, 21 U.S.C. § 841 defines prohibited acts and contains substance- and quantity-dependent penalty provisions. Section 846 provides that attempt or conspiracy carries the penalties prescribed for the object offense. The indictment, laboratory evidence, attribution theory, role allegations, and applicable penalty provision therefore require case-specific review.

§ 03

The first contested issue may be detention

A federal defendant may appear before a magistrate judge shortly after arrest. The government may request detention in the circumstances identified by § 3142. Because the hearing can occur quickly, information bearing on appearance, safety, proposed conditions, and the statutory factors must be organized early.

After indictment and arraignment, discovery and motion practice develop under the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, constitutional disclosure duties, local rules, protective orders, and the judge’s scheduling order. Multi-defendant and electronic-evidence cases may involve extensive productions that must be organized into a usable trial record.

If the matter reaches sentencing, the advisory Sentencing Guidelines, statutory ranges, presentence report, objections, and 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors shape the hearing. Sentencing preparation is not postponed until the end of the case; factual and mitigation records develop throughout the representation.

§ 04

Target letters, subpoenas, interviews, and search warrants

Federal exposure may become visible through a target or subject letter, a grand-jury subpoena, contact from an agent, a search warrant, or charges against another person. Early counsel can identify the known posture, communicate with the government where appropriate, address preservation, and evaluate parallel state exposure.

The initial inquiry should identify the person, agency, district, subpoena or deadline, conflict-check names, and whether the person is a witness, subject, target, or defendant if that has been communicated. It should not attach documents or provide a detailed factual narrative before conflict review.

§ 05

Build one record from investigation through sentencing

Federal defense requires integration: detention facts can affect later strategy; discovery organization informs motions; motions define the trial record; and factual findings can affect the Guidelines. The defense plan must account for those connections rather than treating every hearing as an isolated event.

Mr. McKenna is admitted to the United States District Court for the District of Nevada and the Ninth Circuit. An accepted federal matter is scoped around the investigation, discovery, expert, motion, trial, and sentencing work it actually requires.

FAQ

Frequently Asked

Inquire

Federal deadlines often arrive before the full file does.

Identify the person, agency or court, investigation or charging stage, subpoena or next date, custody, and conflict-check names. Do not attach discovery or send a detailed narrative before conflict review.